This seal is an "Export approval mark" and it is called a "Jianding". They have been issued from around 1949 and are still being put on any old looking porcelain which are to be allowed to be exported out of China. It does not guarantee anything except this.
In practical use, when applying these exports permits to pieces, and the answer you usually gets when asking around in China, is that no pieces older then 100 years gets this seal.
The seal is thus no GUARANTEE that the piece is antique. By law it could be made from 1795 up to absolutely modern. In practice it is most likely made in the mid 1920s up to the 1950s when the production of "antique looking Chinese porcelain" made with traditional methods were particularly intense and a great deal of the Chinese porcelain industry at large was surviving by making this kind of porcelain.
Originally there were two different state departments in charge of the exportation of antiques from China. It was the State Export Department, active between 1949-86 and the Cultural Relics Bureau, of which only the latter are still active.
Before the late 1980s there also seems to have been four main export bureaus, located in Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai and Guangzhou (Canton). After this time many provinces seems to have gotten their own export bureaus since from then on new seals have appeared from Hunan, Jijiang, Quangxi, Hebei etc.
So far only one instance is known where a seal (Mark 266 below) has been issued on anything older then mid 19th century and not even this is entirely certain. I will change this statement as soon as anything supporting a contrary view is availably.
| Jian Ding (Certified) Export Approval Seals | |
|---|---|
 |
439. "Jian Ding" (Certified Export approval seal mark). This type seems to have come into use in about 1997. |
| Guangdong (Province)/Canton (Guan) | |
|---|---|
Guangdong (Province) 1 Jian Ding |
410. Rubber stamped mark "Jian Ding" (Certified) Guan (Guangdong (Province)/Canton) 1", on ewer from around 1850's. This stamp mark was probaly issued by State Export Department, active between 1949-86. |
Guangdong (Province) 1 Jian Ding |
266. Rubber stamp mark "Jian Ding" (Certified) Guangdong (Province) 1. This stamp mark was issued by State Export Department between 1949-86. This stamp was discontinued in 1986. |
Guangdong (Province) Cultural Relics Bureau #1 |
46. Jian Ding (Certified). Export approval seal mark. This seal is from Guangdong (Province) Cultural Relics Bureau #1, Guangdong (Canton) Province. |
Guangdong (Province) Cultural Relics Bureau #1. |
1080. Jian Ding (Certified). Export approval seal mark. This seal is from Guangdong (Province) Cultural Relics Bureau #1, Guangdong (Canton) Province. |
Guangdong (Province) Cultural Relics Bureau #2. |
1212. Jian Ding (Certified) Guangdong (Province). Cultural Relics Bureau #2 (Guangdong (Province) = Canton). Export approval seal. A hard core communist area during the mid 20th century. Seal possibly in use at the time of the cultural revolution. |
| Shanghai | |
|---|---|
Shanghai Cultural Relics Bureau #2. |
1300. Jian Ding (Certified). Export approval seal mark from the Shanghai Cultural Relics Bureau #2. The single character preceding the numeral is the alternative or short name for 'Shanghai', the seal dating from the CCP era. |
Shanghai Cultural Relics Bureau #3. |
1380. Jian Ding (Certified). Export approval seal mark from the Shanghai Cultural Relics Bureau #2. The single character preceding the numeral is the alternative or short name for 'Shanghai', the seal dating from the CCP era. |
 Shanghai Cultural Relics Bureau #4. |
276. Jian Ding (Certified). Export approval seal mark from the Shanghai Cultural Relics Bureau #4. |
| Beijing | |
|---|---|
 Beijing Cultural Relics Bureau #1. |
369. Jian Ding (Certified). Export approval seal mark from Beijing Cultural Relics Bureau. Late 20th century. |
Beijing Cultural Relics Bureau #2. |
295. Jian Ding (Certified). Export approval seal mark from Beijing Cultural Relics Bureau. |
 |
306. "Jian Ding" (Certified Export approval seal mark) from the Curtural Relics Bureau in Beijing, with a paper sticker marked "Tienanman Square" probably indicating that this "relic" was bought in the Friendshop Store in Bejing. Style typical of the 1990's. |
| Tianjin | |
|---|---|
 Tianjin First Cultural Relics Bureau. |
511. "Jian Ding" (Certified) Tianjin First Cultural Relics Bureau. Export approval seal mark from Tianjin. |
Tianjin Second Cultural Relics Bureau. |
512. "Jian Ding" (Certified) Tianjin Second Cultural Relics Bureau. Export approval seal mark from Tianjin. |
| Zhejiang (Huan) | |
|---|---|
 Zhejiang Cultural Relics Bureau. |
334. "Jian Ding" (Certified) "Huan". Cultural Relics Bureau Export approval seal mark from Zhejiang. Huan is a short form of Zhejiang. |
| Suzhou (Su) | |
|---|---|
 Su = Suzhou Cultural Relics Bureau 1 |
1496. The two larger characters says "Jian Ding" (Certified) and below that a small character "Su" and the number 1. This is the Suzhou Cultural Relics Bureau #1 Export approval seal where Su is a short form for Suzhou. |
| Unknown | |
|---|---|
 WEN or NEW |
1214. "WEN or NEW, read from right to left". Possible fake export approval seal mark. The item it was applied to appears to be an authentic Song dynasty bowl. |
The marks section of Gotheborg.com was initially established in May 2000 thanks to a generous donation of approximately one hundred images of Japanese porcelain marks, by Karl-Hans Schneider from Euskirchen, Germany. This contribution provided a modest yet substantial beginning of the Marks Section. It was a kind gesture that I really appreciated.
Of the many later contributors, I would especially want to mention Albert Becker, Somerset, UK, who was the first to help with some translations and comments on the Japanese marks. His work was then greatly extended by Ms. Gloria S. Garaventa, after which Mr. John Avery looked into and corrected some of the dates. Most of the Satsuma marks were originally submitted by Ms. Michaela Russell, Brisbane, Australia. A section which was then greatly extended by Ian & Mary Heriot, a large amount of information from which still awaits publication.
A warm thank you also goes to John R. Skeens, Florida, U.S.A., and Toru Yoshikawa for the Kitagawa Togei section, and to Susan Eades for her help and encouragement towards the creation of the Moriyama section. For the last full overhaul of the Satsuma and Kutani sections, thank you to Howard Reed, Australia. The most recent larger contribution was made by Lisa M. Surowiec, New Jersey, USA.
In 2004 and from then on, my warm thank you goes to John Wocher and Howard Reed, whose knowledge and interest have sparked new life into this section and given reason for a new overhaul. Thank you again and thank you to all I have not mentioned here, for all help and interest in and contributions to our knowledge of 20th-century Japanese porcelain.
The Chinese marks section would not have been possible without the dedicated help of Mr. Simon Ng, City University of Hong Kong, whose translations and personal efforts in researching the origin and dates of the different marks have been an invaluable resource. It has since been greatly extended by several contributors such as Cordelia Bay, USA, Walt Brygier, USA, Bonnie Hoffmann, Harmen Lensink, 'Tony' Yalin Zhang, Beijing, 'ScottLoar', Shanghai, Mike Harty, and many more expert members of the Gotheborg Discussion Board.
A number of reference pieces have also been donated by Simon Ng, N K Koh, Singapore, Hans Mueller, USA, Hans Slager, Belgium, William Turnbull, Canada, and Tony Jalin Zhang, Beijing.
All images and text submitted by visitors and published anywhere on this site are and remain the copyrighted property of the submitter and appears here by permission of the owners which can be revoked at any time. All information on this site, that are not specifically referenced to peer reviewed sources, are the personal opinions given in good faith by me, my friends and fellow experts, based on photos and the owners' submitted descriptions. They are not to be used for any financial or commercial decisions, but for educational and personal interest only, and can and will be changed as further information merits.
For further studies, Encyclopedia Britannica is to be recommended in preference to Wikipedia, which, not being peer-reviewed, might contain misleading information.
Web design and content as it appears here © Jan-Erik Nilsson 1996-.